I realize it's probably not cool to cut and paste an entire article from the New York Times. But I'm not cool so I'm not going to worry about it. A friend posted a link to this article on Facebook today and I thought it nicely dovetailed with the post I wrote about business a few months ago. (By "dovetail" I mean, he says it better and more articulately than me but I said it first.)
Anyway, enjoy!
The 'Busy' Trap
If you live in America in the 21st century you’ve probably had to listen
to a lot of people tell you how busy they are. It’s become the default
response when you ask anyone how they’re doing: “Busy!” “So busy.” “Crazy
busy.” It is, pretty obviously, a boast disguised as a complaint. And
the stock response is a kind of congratulation: “That’s a good problem
to have,” or “Better than the opposite.”
Notice it isn’t generally people pulling back-to-back shifts in the
I.C.U. or commuting by bus to three minimum-wage jobs who tell you how
busy they are; what those people are is not busy but tired. Exhausted. Dead on their feet.
It’s almost always people whose lamented busyness is purely
self-imposed: work and obligations they’ve taken on voluntarily, classes
and activities they’ve “encouraged” their kids to participate in.
They’re busy because of their own ambition or drive or anxiety, because
they’re addicted to busyness and dread what they might have to face in
its absence.
Almost everyone I know is busy. They feel anxious and guilty when they
aren’t either working or doing something to promote their work. They
schedule in time with friends the way students with 4.0 G.P.A.’s make
sure to sign up for community service because it looks good on their
college applications. I recently wrote a friend to ask if he wanted to
do something this week, and he answered that he didn’t have a lot of
time but if something was going on to let him know and maybe he could
ditch work for a few hours. I wanted to clarify that my question had not
been a preliminary heads-up to some future invitation; this was
the invitation. But his busyness was like some vast churning noise
through which he was shouting out at me, and I gave up trying to shout
back over it.
Even children are busy now, scheduled down to the half-hour
with classes and extracurricular activities. They come home at the end
of the day as tired as grown-ups. I was a member of the latchkey
generation and had three hours of totally unstructured, largely
unsupervised time every afternoon, time I used to do everything from
surfing the World Book Encyclopedia to making animated films to getting
together with friends in the woods to chuck dirt clods directly into one
another’s eyes, all of which provided me with important skills and
insights that remain valuable to this day. Those free hours became the
model for how I wanted to live the rest of my life.
The present
hysteria is not a necessary or inevitable condition of life; it’s
something we’ve chosen, if only by our acquiescence to it. Not long ago I
Skyped with a friend who was driven out of the city by high rent and
now has an artist’s residency in a small town in the south of France.
She described herself as happy and relaxed for the first time in years.
She still gets her work done, but it doesn’t consume her entire day and
brain. She says it feels like college — she has a big circle of friends
who all go out to the cafe together every night. She has a boyfriend
again. (She once ruefully summarized dating in New York: “Everyone’s too
busy and everyone thinks they can do better.”) What she had mistakenly
assumed was her personality — driven, cranky, anxious and sad — turned
out to be a deformative effect of her environment. It’s not as if any of
us wants to live like this, any more than any one person wants to be
part of a traffic jam or stadium trampling or the hierarchy of cruelty
in high school — it’s something we collectively force one another to do.
Busyness serves as a kind of existential reassurance, a hedge against
emptiness; obviously your life cannot possibly be silly or trivial or
meaningless if you are so busy, completely booked, in demand every hour
of the day. I once knew a woman who interned at a magazine where she
wasn’t allowed to take lunch hours out, lest she be urgently needed for
some reason. This was an entertainment magazine whose raison d’ĂȘtre was
obviated when “menu” buttons appeared on remotes, so it’s hard to see
this pretense of indispensability as anything other than a form of
institutional self-delusion. More and more people in this country no
longer make or do anything tangible; if your job wasn’t performed by a
cat or a boa constrictor in a Richard Scarry book I’m not sure I believe
it’s necessary. I can’t help but wonder whether all this histrionic
exhaustion isn’t a way of covering up the fact that most of what we do
doesn’t matter.
I am not busy. I am the laziest ambitious person I
know. Like most writers, I feel like a reprobate who does not deserve
to live on any day that I do not write, but I also feel that four or
five hours is enough to earn my stay on the planet for one more day. On
the best ordinary days of my life, I write in the morning, go for a long
bike ride and run errands in the afternoon, and in the evening I see
friends, read or watch a movie. This, it seems to me, is a sane and
pleasant pace for a day. And if you call me up and ask whether I won’t
maybe blow off work and check out the new American Wing at the Met or
ogle girls in Central Park or just drink chilled pink minty cocktails
all day long, I will say, what time?
But just in the last few
months, I’ve insidiously started, because of professional obligations,
to become busy. For the first time I was able to tell people, with a
straight face, that I was “too busy” to do this or that thing they
wanted me to do. I could see why people enjoy this complaint; it makes
you feel important, sought-after and put-upon. Except that I hate
actually being busy. Every morning my in-box was full of e-mails asking
me to do things I did not want to do or presenting me with problems that
I now had to solve. It got more and more intolerable until finally I
fled town to the Undisclosed Location from which I’m writing this.
Here
I am largely unmolested by obligations. There is no TV. To check e-mail
I have to drive to the library. I go a week at a time without seeing
anyone I know. I’ve remembered about buttercups, stink bugs and the
stars. I read. And I’m finally getting some real writing done for the
first time in months. It’s hard to find anything to say about life
without immersing yourself in the world, but it’s also just about
impossible to figure out what it might be, or how best to say it,
without getting the hell out of it again.
Idleness is not just a vacation, an indulgence or a vice; it is as
indispensable to the brain as vitamin D is to the body, and deprived of
it we suffer a mental affliction as disfiguring as rickets. The space
and quiet that idleness provides is a necessary condition for standing
back from life and seeing it whole, for making unexpected connections
and waiting for the wild summer lightning strikes of inspiration — it
is, paradoxically, necessary to getting any work done. “Idle dreaming is
often of the essence of what we do,” wrote Thomas Pynchon in his essay
on sloth. Archimedes’ “Eureka” in the bath, Newton’s apple, Jekyll &
Hyde and the benzene ring: history is full of stories of inspirations
that come in idle moments and dreams. It almost makes you wonder whether
loafers, goldbricks and no-accounts aren’t responsible for more of the
world’s great ideas, inventions and masterpieces than the hardworking.
“The
goal of the future is full unemployment, so we can play. That’s why we
have to destroy the present politico-economic system.” This may sound
like the pronouncement of some bong-smoking anarchist, but it was
actually Arthur C. Clarke, who found time between scuba diving and
pinball games to write “Childhood’s End” and think up communications
satellites. My old colleague Ted Rall recently wrote a column proposing
that we divorce income from work and give each citizen a guaranteed
paycheck, which sounds like the kind of lunatic notion that’ll be
considered a basic human right in about a century, like abolition,
universal suffrage and eight-hour workdays. The Puritans turned work
into a virtue, evidently forgetting that God invented it as a
punishment.
Perhaps the world would soon slide to ruin if everyone
behaved as I do. But I would suggest that an ideal human life lies
somewhere between my own defiant indolence and the rest of the world’s
endless frenetic hustle. My role is just to be a bad influence, the kid
standing outside the classroom window making faces at you at your desk,
urging you to just this once make some excuse and get out of there, come
outside and play. My own resolute idleness has mostly been a luxury
rather than a virtue, but I did make a conscious decision, a long time
ago, to choose time over money, since I’ve always understood that the
best investment of my limited time on earth was to spend it with people I
love. I suppose it’s possible I’ll lie on my deathbed regretting that I
didn’t work harder and say everything I had to say, but I think what
I’ll really wish is that I could have one more beer with Chris, another
long talk with Megan, one last good hard laugh with Boyd. Life is too
short to be busy.
Tim Kreider is the author of “We Learn Nothing,”
a collection of essays and cartoons. His cartoon, “The Pain — When Will
It End?” has been collected in three books by Fantagraphics.
1 comment:
I certainly agree, in large part, with his theme. I felt a wonderfulness about the time I was recovering when i was through w/pain and the other misfortunes of ill health, and could get on with the healing. That included a forced retirement from busynes. I read, literally pondered on whether or not John Grisham was the only author who seemed to be in mid-life crisis, talked to friends and family who came to visit and stayed awhile, had a vakay from Church callings, and Story League details, and other such formerly "pressing" responsibilities.
However ... I notice Mr. Kreider makes no mention of family, Church or other volunteer involvements, and similar places where one finds the love of service. His article, then, seems a little selfish, a lot lonely, and one I would certainly not choose.
Post a Comment